California Designated Operator Practice Exam

How must a secondary containment system be constructed if it is separate from primary containment?

1. According to manufacturer specifications

2. Based on industry standards or approved engineering specifications

3. As per local government regulations only

4. Following any available guidelines

The correct answer is: Based on industry standards or approved engineering specifications

The requirement for constructing a secondary containment system that is separate from primary containment is based on industry standards or approved engineering specifications. This construction approach ensures that the secondary containment is designed to adequately manage potential leaks or spills from the primary containment. By adhering to these standards, the system can effectively prevent environmental contamination and ensure compliance with safety regulations. Industry standards take into account various factors such as material compatibility, structural integrity, and the specific characteristics of the substances being contained, which are essential for proper performance. Approved engineering specifications provide a scientifically-backed approach to design, ensuring that safety features are reliably integrated into the system. While manufacturer specifications may provide valuable guidelines, they do not encompass the broader requirements mandated by industry standards, which are developed through extensive research and practical testing. Relying solely on local government regulations may also overlook critical aspects that are covered by comprehensive industry standards. Following any available guidelines could lead to inconsistencies in safety and effectiveness. Thus, the correct emphasis on constructing secondary containment systems according to industry standards or approved engineering specifications reflects a well-established practice for ensuring safety and regulatory compliance in the handling of potentially hazardous materials.